I’ve just completed the first stage of my research project, looking at student satisfaction/dissatisfaction with the online aspects of their experience as students within our programme. A summary of these results follows. Please note that I haven’t spent much time in preparing it for reading. It’s really just a summary of the data with a few reflections thrown in.
Overall
The first years are much more satisfied with the course than the second years.
-
First year: 100% very satisfied/ satisfied
-
Second year: 80% satisfied / 20% dissatisfied
-
Possible reasons
-
Second-time delivery is always considerably smoother than first-time delivery. Second year material is often being developed just-in-time which can lead to a lack of clarity at times.
-
With the implementation of the OP IT Induction process this year, and with more integrated support from the learning centre, the first year students have experienced an increased level of support for IT skill development & academic skill development.
-
The first year of online delivery was not smooth sailing. We had a huge learning curve, which combined with a lower level of funding that was anticipated, resulted in a lot of change, which the students found frustrating. In 2009, this group seems particularly resistant to changes, and are fairly unforgiving of any perceived lacks in their course of study.
-
Level & quality of interaction with staff
First year – Mostly satisfied (6.3% dissatisfied)
Second year – 60% satisfied / 40% dissatisfied
The concerns in this area are largely based around delayed scheduling for the clinic and Bioscience classes which has impacted on some students who are working part-time. As a staff group, we’ve decided to finalise all scheduling before we finish up at the end of the year to minimise this type of effect.
Some of the other concerns raised are duplicated in the section on clarity of direction, and are discussed here.
Level and quality of interaction with other students
Generally the students seem happy with this.
Quality and frequency of feedback on your progress
Generally the students are fairly happy with this.
How often do you feel clear on what you need to do to progress in your course work?
First year & second year: 50% always/usually, 50% sometimes/not often
Even though I’ve worked to improve clarity of information structures and processes (being aware that this was a problem with last year’s cohort), clarity remains the area of most concern for both first and second year students. Clearly clarity of direction is key in being an effective student.
Common themes are
-
Difficulty with assessments – locating the assessments, knowing assessment due dates, not receiving assessments soon enough
-
Some of the first year students would like more explaining of where everything is and how to get at it (information structures, and processes). A screen movie would be the best way to efficiently provide for this need. We can then cover this material at the start of the course, and students who are struggling to understand can view the movie repeatedly if need be.
-
Elluminate class times have been scheduled generally (e.g. this time is set aside for elluminate sessions). It would be useful for part-time students to have specific classes scheduled on the timetable.
-
Some complaints of delayed communication from lecturers. It’s somewhat difficult for lecturers to be highly responsive when they work for Polytechnic part-time. I do what I can to improve responsiveness when it seems important, but there is probably not much more we can do about this complaint at present.
-
Some students have expressed a preference for a simpler structure (i.e. Blackboard), but for reasons previously discussed, this is not an option that we are entertaining at present.
-
No reports of problems with clarity of instructions from lecturers.
It seems that the structure which is in place is workable with a few improvements. Making better use of the course calender by embedding assessment dates and scheduling specific elluminate classes should be very helpful. Also providing first year students with a little more opportunity to become familiar with the structure of the learning environment in the early stages should pay dividends.
Support for computer use
Students were fairly happy with computer support in the following areas – use of a computer, email, elluminate, using Microsoft products, Internet searching & Other computer use.
Two areas where there were a considerable number of dissatisfied students were in support of Blackboard & use of Google docs.
Blackboard use
Year 1: 31.3% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Year 2: No dissatisfaction
Use of google docs
Year 1: 31.3% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Year 2: 2 0% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Students seem to perceive that there is a lot of support available, but it’s better in some areas than others. Blackboard & Google docs could be supported better. We planned to run a session on Google docs in our first practical block, but I decided not to because I believed that the students were getting overloaded.
The community learning centre environment may not be ideal for high need students who are suffering from the convergence of the need to improve their computer literacy & the demands of their study (“Staff in the clcs will help but not that willingly,only one thing at a time and you 3 have to wait 10mins for them to come over to you”).
Suggestions range from suggestions for more IT tutorials to a comment that “the polytechnic has excellent resources to ensure anyone can understand computer use- people just need to use them!”
We plan to initiate a peer tutoring programme next year using some of the second year students. This should help.
Confidence with computer use
First year: 20 % sometimes confident/not confident
Second year: 20% sometimes confident
In the first year group, it appears from the feedback of most of the class that the technical difficulty of the computer work is not too high. It seems to be well within the capabilities of most of the class.
The second years have a high level of confidence with the use of any computer applications used previously, but are lacking in confidence with blogging. In particular issues around privacy & sharing thoughts/work openly have been discussed. Some students believe that the poorer students will coast through on the work of the better students.
Computer self-efficacy has been shown to improve with exposure to computer use, and this finding does seem to be reflected in my data so far. I plan to adopt a wait and see approach – I expect that these figures will change by the next survey date.
Ability to avoid distractions and concentrate on studies
First years: 64.3% always/usually | 35.7% sometimes/not often
Second years: 50% always/usually | 50% sometimes/not often
These percentages are fairly high, and they may be considered a problem, but it would be interesting to compare these results to similar results from other tertiary environments where students have a reasonable amount of flexibility (e.g university style lectures).
There were fairly consistent messages from both groups about the reasons for distractions – good weather, socialising, family commitments, noises in the environment, tv, conflict in the student group, a lack of interest in the subject. some people alluded to juggling study with other commitments (training/work/hobbies),
One student stated that it was distracting when people were talking/typing in elluminate when the teacher is talking. This is distracting, and does take some time to get used to, but there are benefits to having those two communication channels going.
Summary of the summary
It seems that the area that most needs development work is in clarity of student direction. To achieve this I plan to
- Embed assessment dates within the course calender
- Schedule specific elluminate classes within the calender
- Work on minimising delays in student-staff communication
- Create a blog page which contains links to the main course areas for the second year students (i.e. something which they can access through Google reader which provides links to everything they need). This has been requested specifically by the class reps.
Now it’s just a matter of finding some time to do this in the mayhem of my life!!

4 comments
Comments feed for this article
April 19, 2009 at 10:03 pm
leighblackall
Hi Dave, thanks for the info – very interesting.
Regarding the use of blogs and the issue of open communications. I think this is a significant issue and allowances should be made. One way is to show your students how to blog privately. They either save as draft in Blogger, or post privately in WordPress. My advice then would be to have those who are posting privately to email a copy to their lecturer. This begs the question of why blog at all.. I think this approach allows for a longer term possibility, if the student were to later see the value in publishing their work. Private blogging also teaches them basic technical skills they need for creating and maintaining their own web presence. They won’t develop the skills for networking and online social learning, but there is perhaps a good reason for this…
It seems to me that you will need to first show your students the value of online networking and social learning. I think their concerns are quite valid in the context of the only learning environment they know – competitive and assessed. Networked learning is almost the exact opposite to that, and takes time to appreciate.
So my suggestion is to first teach them how to read and follow important blogs. This is hard to teach, and hard to motivate. So I’d go for core blogs to follow – one of them being yours. When I say “blogs” I mean RSS feeds. Each week of “reading online information” I would find, assess and add 1 more feed. The goal is to try and observe that social connectivity that occurs online. A very difficult thing to show without being a part of it.
After some time of this, then it could be the right time to propose developing a class network.. but not before assessment and competitive drives have been watered down, and collaborative approaches have been enthused.
Just my thoughts. PS.. show your students this blog post and ask for comments! That would be a good first step.
April 19, 2009 at 10:49 pm
davidmcquillan
I’m a little reluctant to introduce private blogging, because the natural progression from that in my mind is no blogging. If some students are blogging, and some are emailing their work, in effect the ones who are emailing work will be at an advantage in that they’ll be able to see the work of the bloggers.
Some of the first years have commented that they have been really enjoying blogging, and I believe that the experience of the second years is largely based on the fact that it’s a new technology that they’re not comfortable with yet (the confidence finding).
I do think that however the use of blogging in assessment needs to be suited to the tool. For example, when the students are creating highly individualised assessment (e.g. everyone has a different task, or the task is to reflect on and state their perspective on a particular issue) then blogging is probably appropriate. When students need to demonstrate understanding of some knowledge that has been passed on by the teacher, or when a high level of inter-student consistency is expected blogging is probably not appropriate because students will be able to easily copy/translate the work of others.
Re: Getting networked
The plan is to start off by just getting them to subscribe to course blogs, we might start introducing additional blogs in the second semester, then in the second year start encouraging them to find their own blogs to subscribe to. At this stage we’ll have to deal with the phenomenon of information overload & management of information flows, but we’ll cross that bridge when we come to it.
I’m not sure if we’ll make it to true networked learning, largely due to the way that students seem to become less interested in learning and more interested in passing assessments as they progress in their studies
. I think one of the pre-requisites of networked learning is the desire to follow your own knowledge journey. Would you agree? It’d be ideal if we could incubate this in the students, but I haven’t had much luck so far.
April 23, 2009 at 12:56 am
Felicity Molloy
H yall from up here n the North- looking forward to being back n the fray next week
I am reading these blogs with great interest – theissues seem to st n balance between what a student thnks they are gong to learn and how the course provder is providing that learning. So there is an interesting triad of negotiables and emphases
Student and knowledge
Teacher and knowledge
Technology and knowledge
Technology and student
Teacher and technology
Student and teacher
I agree with you about the second time roll out of a course, David and also a possible solution of immersion learning in the learning styles promoted by socially constructed media – if thats what you meant, Leigh?
There is an interesting article by Mehrabian, A. (Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behaviour, 1969) about the various expectational outcomes of behavioural tendencies of learning – communication/ intimacy, motivation and information gathering may hold some thematic clues?.
from reading your early results, David – it woudl seem that students’ motivation and teacher motivation backed by Polytechnic supoort levels produces an environemnt which to some extent diverges from the stated reasons for the massage students presence there?
I am finding the students healthy response/ resistance is diminished by communication, and I am convinced that this blended delivery is profoundly
helpful in shaoing a deep enduring (lifelong!) curiosity about there chosen discipline. So
I know I am least fo technology able in your presence – but I support what you are doing on a deeply professional and interested level.
PS I fully agree about the evolved blog for blog assessment approach – i.e. Blog 1 if fitting the rubric does not need to be revisited. Yeehah!
PPS Also I do find intermittent/ strategic face to face moments to be extremely helpful in confirming learning- where does this fit? I wonder?
PPPS – I am intrigued by the privacy issue myself (having worjked in the performign arts for so many years – I think students need to be ablke to negoatiate privacy in ways that doen impact on their learning achievement – A wierdly out of date example – at fifth form (school cert english) level we (students) were giving an examination question to critique a tv programme – my family had never owned one and I had hardly any attachment or motivation to watch tv – nor was I equipped to dissemble the learning structure accessiblity form the watchngness.. hmmm. I was unable to answer that question and therefore restricted in both my learning and achievement at the assessment post – not at the course post..
See you both next week for a very full fortnight of preparation…
FM
August 16, 2009 at 2:49 am
bronwyn hegarty
Hi David
you have got some really worthwhile findings from your research project. Is the reason you have reported the negative % in two areas – support for computer use – Blackboard and Google docs – and Confidence with computer use – because these were areas of concern? It would be great to see the more positive side reported as well.
Are the dissatisfaction % lower for second year students because they already had experience with accessing your course online?
Blackboard use
Year 1: 31.3% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Year 2: No dissatisfaction
Use of google docs
Year 1: 31.3% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Year 2: 2 0% dissatisfied/very dissatisfied
Confidence with computer use
First year: 20 % sometimes confident/not confident
Second year: 20% sometimes confident